tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8956593602649507553.post6023057034747655774..comments2016-08-08T16:34:12.846-07:00Comments on The Philosopher Stoned: Template for Universal Math and Geometrycodymrosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06856332182975497782noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8956593602649507553.post-33179787071518625252016-07-12T10:17:08.165-07:002016-07-12T10:17:08.165-07:00Fantastic! I've been looking for how the gold...Fantastic! I've been looking for how the golden ratio interacts with the Vector Equilibrium (VE). I've modeled all of this geometry and have noticed many other ratios not mentioned in this blog, such as sqrt(3), sqrt(2), sqrt(5), all associated with distances between faces and/or distances between vertices as the geometry morphs through this cycle.<br /><br />I have not yet found the sqrt(7), the only remaining one (the sqrt's of 4,6,8,9 of course are all subsets of sqrt's of 2 and 3). It's interesting that you also mention cube roots, I haven't considered this.<br /><br />I'd be happy to share the study, but not sure how to enclose here.JLBhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04307368707550580799noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8956593602649507553.post-10586582423301315672014-01-08T07:31:06.881-08:002014-01-08T07:31:06.881-08:00Interesting. But you used my copyrighted image of...Interesting. But you used my copyrighted image of the double spiral within the E8 projection without attribution. This was an original discovery and was published here: http://wizardgynoid.wordpress.com/2009/05/06/new-double-spiral-into-the-heart-of-the-e8/ You have my permission to use it as long as you attribute it properly.Wizzyhttp://wizardgynoid.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8956593602649507553.post-371734252632716752012-06-26T15:38:40.802-07:002012-06-26T15:38:40.802-07:00https://sites.google.com/site/sekretycivilizacii2/...https://sites.google.com/site/sekretycivilizacii2/Александр Матвеевhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06410156914600999033noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8956593602649507553.post-40005071377880411582011-12-07T15:30:59.133-08:002011-12-07T15:30:59.133-08:0024-cell
http://nevredim.ucoz.ru/24-cell<br /><br />http://nevredim.ucoz.ru/23http://www.blogger.com/profile/08078020357647551733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8956593602649507553.post-73594708877158038002011-01-12T18:17:54.831-08:002011-01-12T18:17:54.831-08:00Also, review the multiplication table which points...Also, review the multiplication table which points out the 3, 6, 9s in columns and the obvious inverts:<br /><br />example of 3s, following 369:<br />1x3=3,<br />2x3=6,<br />3x3=9,<br /><br />6s follow 639:<br />6x1=6,<br />6x2=3,<br />6x3=9,<br /><br />9s always follow 999. so you can simply explain that X*9 =9 regardless.<br /><br />*123456789<br />1123456789<br />2246813579<br />3369369369<br />4483726159<br />5516273849<br />6639639639<br />7753186429<br />8876543219<br />9999999999<br /><br />our 3 paired inverts are 1 + 8, 2 + 7, 4 + 5 (which yes, happen to equal 9 and create a HEX.)<br /><br />1 is the invert of 8, therefore;<br />mult. of 1: 123456789 in mult. 8 is 987654321<br /><br />2 is the invert of 7, therefore;<br />mult. of 2: 246813579 in mult. 7 is 975318642<br /><br />and finally...<br />4 is the invert of 5, therefore;<br />x4: 483726159 = invert x5: 951627384dj katthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04394573914061680549noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8956593602649507553.post-67644181350370504972011-01-12T17:44:38.236-08:002011-01-12T17:44:38.236-08:00very nice blog... i'm glad you mentioned the 1...very nice blog... i'm glad you mentioned the 147, 258s.. but it's important that you mention all 3 equilateral triangles points are always separated by 3s (flaunts the perfection)<br /><br />i've mentioned these 3 specific degrees before;<br /><br />1st degree: 1 to 4, 4 to 7, 7 to 1<br />2nd degree: 2 to 5, 5 to 8, 8 to 2<br />3rd degree: 3 to 6, 6 to 9, 9 to 3dj katthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04394573914061680549noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8956593602649507553.post-92230626006882552472011-01-12T15:48:21.438-08:002011-01-12T15:48:21.438-08:00Very good work. What we need to do now is to make ...Very good work. What we need to do now is to make it a workable science. We need to connect this model to equations in Engineering and Physics. Dan Winter has managed to make some of the important details. Energy is a common variable here. In Engineering, Energy in Physics description is the foundation of all its equations.et-Nickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03780962906757767959noreply@blogger.com